It's
somewhere in the back of our minds. All the time, we feel it. That
maybe, someday, we'll complete this novel, revise it to perfection,
and publish
it.
Maybe
you're writing the novel. Maybe you're revising it. Maybe you're
looking to publish it. Or maybe you're just a writer trying to get
better. Nevertheless, we always have that little dream that we'll
get our story out
there.
It won't be a print-and-send-to-relatives tale, but a genuine
published work of art.
That's
why I wrote this post. This isn't a guide to success, but rather an
analysis of where
and how
you should publish.
In
a way, you could refer to this post as another in the teeming
multitude of posts on what many of us call the Great Publishing
Debate.
Because
really, for the young writers, there's two options. You try the hard
route of getting published traditionally, which requires rejections,
queries, agents, and all of that jazz. Or you self-publish, which is
increasingly becoming a viable do-it-yourself option. You could even
do eBook-only, which just requires basic computer knowledge.
In
a way, I might seem biased. After all, I already went the
self-publishing route, right? The
War Horn
is already on the market for any reader who wants to check it out.
But still, the debate goes on, and the forces are evenly matched.
For the young, unpublished writer, it's a hard decision.
Why?
Listen up and I'll tell you.
At
first, self-publishing looks better. After all, you get tons of
money (which is debatable), you do it yourself, and more importantly,
you don't have to go through the lengthy process of actually getting
noticed. Getting published traditionally looks like a lot
of work!
Nevertheless,
traditional publishing has several advantages. First, they have
reach.
They're trusted. They're well-known. They can reach audiences you
can never get to on your own. Christian fiction authors Donita K.
Paul and Wayne Thomas Batson have each sold over a quarter million
copies of their books. That's a ton of readers!
Traditional
publishers also have the advantage of bookstores, which, despite
online retailers like Amazon, are still a fantastic source of
advertising. Even if the books aren't bought, they're seen.
Physical books on a physical shelf in a physical store seem somewhat
more compelling. Some people I know buy their books primarily
through bookstores.
Okay,
now the publishing scene sways in favor of the traditional
publishers. But there's one huge problem with traditional
publishers: money.
Let
me show you.
On
Amazon.com, the average digital Christian fiction eBook costs ten
dollars
to buy.
Also
on Amazon, my own eBook (The
War Horn)
costs three
dollars to
buy.
Okay,
so traditional books are more expensive. But wait, there's more.
One
Christian author once stated that he averages about fifty
cents
per book he sells. That's a twentieth
of the list price.
When
I sell one book on Amazon, I get about two
dollars.
That's seventy
percent
of the list price. So that author's book is three times more
expensive than mine, but I would make four times as much money as he
does per book. Those are tough statistics!
Using
those stats, it also means that even if this guy sells four times as
many books as I do, we'd be making the same amount of money. If I
sell a hundred books, I'd get two hundred dollars. If a this
author's book sells a hundred copies, he'd get fifty dollars.
That's
a big difference, and now
it looks like self-publishing is in the lead.
But
he makes more money than I do. Why? Because he has a big following.
How did he get that? Through
traditional publishing.
And
just to stir things up, a third paradigm is emerging: independent
publishers with high royalty rates, unlike traditional publishers.
Marcher Lord Press is a high-quality Christian speculative fiction
publisher that releases tons of great books. If a book has Marcher
Lord Press's name on it, I'd read it. Their name is almost
synonymous with great Christian fiction.
Independent
publishers are spreading, too. Scott Appleton is a Christian fantasy
author who started Flaming Pen Press. It's published several great
books thus far, such as J. R. Parker's Kestrel's
Midnight Song and the
soon-to-be-released Out
of Darkness Rising by
Gillian Adams. Another publisher to watch is the newly-launched
Magpie Eclectic Press, which was started by Nichole White, who did
the cover art for The War
Horn.
This
is the Great Publishing Debate, and it's highly confusing and
controversial. It's constantly being changed by innovations in the
market, such as Amazon's Kindle Select.
Now
that you've seen it, here's my stance.
Marketing
is a huge
advantage. I've learned that for myself. The
War Horn
occasionally picks up a few sales, but without a sizable following or
a big name behind it, its progress is slow. Unless you've written
something that has an insanely awesome plot (and an equally good
synopsis) that makes it as compelling as the newest thrillers from
traditional publishers, chances are, you'll have a hard time
attracting random people to your books.
Still,
it can
be done. I know a writer named Gregory Downs who has sold thousands
of copies of his eBooks after self-publishing with KDP. Again, I
know another Christian writer who put his eBook up as free for
one day
and had ten
thousand
downloads. Getting your book out there takes a lot of commitment,
though.
My
thoughts? I've self-published The War Horn, but I had several
reasons for this. First, the book is just a bit longer than a
hundred pages, hardly a publishable size. Second, it's a pretty
normal historical fiction with an Arthurian twist. Not the most
interesting genre.
I'm
going to continue my self-publishing experiment with my science
fiction short stories, but again, a collection of short stories is
less-than-marketable. Novels are much better for publishers.
Once
I've written a book that I consider good enough - I'm hoping that
Tornado C will be "the one" - I'm going to test out the
waters of traditional publishing. Who knows what'll happen? Marcher
Lord Press now appears to be accepting YA, and AMG Publishers is also
looking open. It's worth a try. Publishers can get you an audience,
and once you have an audience, self-publishing suddenly looks good
again.
My
recommendation to you? Wait until your book is ready to think about
publishing. But once you're ready, I'd suggest trying out traditional
publishing first. It has the advantage of a wide market.
So
what's your opinion on the publishing debate? What do you think
about this whole thing? What are you
planning to do once your novel is finished and ready to be taken to
the world? I'd love to hear your thoughts.
4 comments:
There is also another fact to list.
Traditional publishers can make your book go out of print if it doesn't sell enough. If it doesn't sell enough, it doesn't necessarily mean that what you've written is terrible, it means that perhaps the publishers didn't do their job to spread the word about the book. This is what happened for two great authors that I have read from.
Sharon Hinck and Professor Briggs.
So yeah, whether or not you publish traditionally or self publish or create your own publishing house and only publish stuff you and people in your family write(like another author, Andrew Peterson), you still need to advertise your book/s like every day in some way.
This is really helpful, especially since I'm considering traditionally publishing (or attempting, anyway) a novel this year. Thanks for the insightful post!
Also: I was wondering if you would mind much if I posted a review of "The War Horn" on one of my blogs?
Oh... and another fact to list is that in the contract, you may or may not have to publish your next books under the same publisher whether or not the first book gets out of print. So if you do get published, don't sign the contract till you look it over and make sure there aren't any tricks in it.
And publishers can demand in the contract that you publish a book a year by their publishing house, so that may do harm to your developing writing skills.
Eruantian: absolutely!
Post a Comment