Among all of the characters in a novel,
the villain, the antagonist, is one of the hardest to write. Sure,
you can make a villain that's big, bad, and mean - but a villain with
actual depth is rare.
This is something all writers struggle
with, including myself. I don't have all the answers to the villain
question; in this post, I'll share what I do know.
Villains are essential. Without a
tangible villain, the story lacks balance. If a story portrays only
good, it portrays only half of life; because life is a struggle
between good and evil, between Christ and the forces of darkness.
The villain, therefore, is the
embodiment of that evil, and
usually exhibits one main evil trait. Hate, bitterness, immorality,
revenge, greed, envy, murder, brutality; all are evil ideals that the
villain might embrace. Usually, it's the opposite ideal of what your
hero represents. The hero shows love; the villain shows hate. Etc.
All
right, so it's easy enough to tack on a trait to your villain. But
how do you give him depth, humanity, and a truly chilling presence?
That's
what this post is about.
1)
Don't make the mistake of making your villain single-minded.
That is, don't make it to where he has just one negative ideal.
Villains,
like all people, have many motivations. Aside from his main ideal,
he has other desires and interests. A villain can combine hatred and
revenge, greed and envy, murder and and brutality and bitterness;
real villains are many-layered. They have more than one desire, and
when those desires conflict, that's when we are shown the villain's
true driving desires.
Edmond
Dantes, in the movie The
Count of Monte Cristo,
is a very conflicted character. He's something of an anti-hero,
which gives me a lot of fertile ground for proving my points.
Nothing stands in the way of his revenge; not his wise mentor, not
his money, not his former dependence on God, and not even his love.
Revenge is what sustained him in prison. In one scene, he says
something along the lines of, "Don't take away my hate. It's
all I have."
In
the same way, make your villain have one driving desire; but you have
to prove that his desire really is what drives him. He has to want
something so badly that he'll do anything to get it.
2)
Make your character have
some good in him.
The
scary thing about villains is that we can see ourselves in them. The
villain is who we
will
be if the protagonist doesn't win. The villain is mostly bad, just
as the protagonist is mostly good. But the "mostly" part
is what makes the struggle between the two so fascinating. To our
horror, we find that, in some ways, we empathize with the villain,
even as we hate him.
Give
him some humanity; a tenderness that seems bizarre at first. Say one
villain has a reluctance to kill priests, since a priest helped him
and sheltered him as a child. Make it something that makes sense but
conflicts with his evil ideals.
Even
better, let what is bad in the villain come about because he did
something good. Again, Edmond Dantes is an excellent example. He
was an honest man who trusted everyone, even the people who betrayed
him. That honesty proved to be his downfall. When he was sent to
prison, however, he destroyed his trust and let revenge rule him.
3)
Let us know
what the villain is
capable of.
If
the villain doesn't come into the story until the end, then why will
we fear him? But if we've seen his handiwork before the hero
confronts the villain, we'll be a lot
more
frightened for our hero's safety. In my outline of Tornado C, I
already have several instances in which the villain shows just how
far he has fallen, and that makes him chilling.
Again,
Dantes comes up as an example. (No, he's not a villain, but he has a
lot of villainous traits up until the end.) Dantes will do anything
to get revenge. When he escapes from his prison, Chateau d'If, he
pulls the master of the prison with him off of a cliff. The master
has tortured him for years, so...well, only one of them survives
afterward. This shows how far Dantes will go, and creates a fear in
us. "No, Dantes, don't do it!" we want to shout. "There's
a better way! Let go of your revenge!" Every time he comes
near one of his betrayers, we feel a shiver of fear, because we know
the need for revenge that drives him.
This
doesn't mean that you have to write something gory in order to make
the villain scary. In fact, the worst fear is the fear of the
unknown. Leave the details to the imagination; imagination is best
at scaring itself.
4)
Make him or her realistic.
In
other words, not everyone is a mass-murderer. But everyone struggles
with anger. Make the villain understandable, because we struggle
with the same things. The difference is, the villain uses that evil
and embraces it to elevate himself and his desires, rather than
struggling against it.
The
villain must have normal human needs as well. He needs love; but
because he doesn't get it, he hates those who do. An inhuman villain
becomes a supernatural villain who can wave his hand and do anything,
regardless of morality and conscience. Like I've said before, a true
villain is horrifying because he was once like us.
Now,
before I finish this post, I have one more thing to say, and it's
about anti-heroes.
I
mention The Count
of Monte Cristo quite
a bit, and Dantes (the main character) is pretty much an anti-hero.
That is, he's a hero without too many heroic qualities, at least in
the middle of the movie.
Here's
my advice: stay
away from anti-heroes.
If a hero isn't heroic, then why are we reading this story? If the
tale is bad-versus-bad, why write it? Honestly, which of us has the
wisdom to write a story that is steeped in evil?
The
Count of Monte Cristo
is one of the few stories that pulls off an anti-hero, mainly through
good storytelling, superb characters, and a strong theme. It's very
hard to write an anti-hero story well, at least for Christian
writers. Why?
I
believe that the purpose of the Christian story is to build up, to
glorify God and retell the truths of the Bible. The problem is,
anti-heroes make me feel dirty.
It's not about good versus evil. In those stories, the character
often hate themselves for their evil. I've read stories from young
Christian writers that are, frankly, hopeless.
That is, they're lacking the hope that Christianity offers.
(There's a disturbing trend toward murderer protagonists, too.)
And
if such stories do
offer
hope, they do it in a bad-guy-gets-saved-and-there's-a-happy-ending
kind of way...which is pretty much unrealistic and cheesy.
Therefore,
I cannot
justify anti-heroes unless it is done as well as it was in The
Count of Monte Cristo.
(SPOILERS
FOR THE MOVIE: In that movie, Dantes was redeemed in the end, and
that's why it was satisfying and not degrading. He found that
vengeance was the Lord's, not his. He found that revenge did nothing
but waste his life. He returns to the faith that he had had before
he was imprisoned.
(The
final image we get from the movie was rather moving: a picture from
the prison cell in which Dantes was tortured. He had scraped deep
into the wall, through torture after torture, GOD
WILL GIVE ME JUSTICE. And on that note, the movie ends.)
So
what do you think about villains? How can we, as writers, create
truly chilling but believable villains? What do you
think about anti-heroes?
I'd
love to hear your thoughts!
8 comments:
Good post. I've been having trouble with my villains, I always make them very similar. Now I have a few ideas, which also help with the plot, I'll need to note them down before I forget.
I occasionally anjoy anti-heroes, but I find that most of them end out being too similar.
I really like the Count of Monte Cristo. I've seen all of it before, but I just have never had the time to watch it all in one go.
Excellent post, Jake! I often struggle with my villains, though I think I have one who I've done pretty well. (Well, judging from the fact that she's one person who's read my book's favorite character . . .) My problem is mostly making them realistic and layered and all that.
On the subject of anti-heroes:
What about stories that have multiple protagonists, one of which is an antihero? For example, in a story that I wrote (and have since scrapped because it was pretty terrible), I had three protagonists. Two were most definitely good guys, and the third was more of an anti-hero. She refused to trust people, said she was on her own side, and was a bit violent, among other traits. However, in the end of the story, she does do the right thing, though she hasn't let go of her anger and trust issues yet. (I was planning to have her resolve those in the next book.) What are your thoughts on this sort of character setup?
Ah, villains! They'be got to be among the most interesting characters. And I love/hate how it's true how well we relate to them, especially to the point where we like them better than the protagonist. *guilty laugh*
And anti-heroes... actually one of my favorite words. (Yes, I'm such a nerdy geek) Boromir. Dustfinger. Mulch Diggums. They're relatable too. I can't say that I've ever written one before, though.
Clarification: when I speak of anti-heroes in this post, I'm talking about anti-hero protagonists. I have little against anti-heroes in story, but when they're the main character, I have more problems with it.
Too true, Pathfinder. I love villains. XD
Leilani: first, if the character ends well, all you have to guard against is a cliche or cheesy ending. Second, because a character has vices does not mean they're an anti-hero. Weaknesses are a part of your characters. What I am warning against is protagonist anti-heroes with little good in them at all, such as a mass-murder who hates his or herself.
That being said, if you think you can pull this character off, go for it!
I liked your point about having some good in the villain. To me, the most fascinating (and chilling) villains are the ones who do all of their evil deeds in the name of some "greater good," who actually have motives (though usually not means) that can be sympathized with, who often have redefined morality for themselves (which is certainly realistic; that's our culture incarnate right there). That forces the audience (along with the hero) to actually ponder whether or not the villain is evil and worth defeating, a battle in itself.
Exccellent post about villains; I liked your analysis. I've never read the Count of Monte Cristo, but from your review it sounds quite good.
Your feelings on anti-heroes left me a little...disturbed though; I'm not sure if if was your intention, but it seemed like you took it to the darkest place possible.
I consider the protagonist of my latest story an anti-hero (as opposed to my other works where it was pretty black-and-white).
Over the course of the story he lies, kidnaps and sometimes kills but it is all to save both the entire world and his family from the villains. I think that a protagnist who sometimes does morally questionable things and feels shame is far more human than someone who does either nothing wrong, or worse, does bad things and feels nothing.
When you mentioned "murderer protagonist" I wasn't sure if you meant a person who is a criminal murderer (i.e. serial killer, etc.) or just a person who kills in battle or something.
Either way, I think I've come to enjoy stories where the line between the good guys and the bad blurs at times; it makes it more interesting than the chessboard setup where good and evil clash and there's never any ambiguity of who is right or wrong.
I know this was written some time ago, but I'd apreciate a response, if you have the time.
One more thing: I'm a Christian too, and I was just wondering...did you mean that it was a sin to write anti-heroes? Makes me a little nervous :(
Hey, Brandon! Thank you for your response! Right now I don't have the time to write a proper response, but I apologize if I make it sound like writing anti-heroes is a sin. There's a very big difference between a mistake and a sin. While I believe writing anti-heroes when inexperienced can be a mistake, it is in no way *morally* wrong, any more than writing a murderous character makes you a murderer.
Hopefully I'll find time tonight or tomorrow to write a better response.
Thank you for such a quick response and for clearing up the misunderstanding :). I guess I just got a little upset because the protagonist I described in my earlier comment is the most well-developed of the characters I've made in the nine years I've been writing and it would have been awful to abandon him because I think of him as an anti-hero.
Just a question I had, but when you say "anti-hero" did you mean person who does morally questionable things but has heroic goals or someone who is genuinely bad but is portrayed as a hero? I've heard of this, and what you described seems to be something called "villain protagonist" (an oxymoron if I've ever heard one.)
Post a Comment